| Tier | Price | Unlocks | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 forever | 1 prompt/day · 7-day log · basic wonder map (top category only after day 7) | acquisition |
| Wonder+ Monthly | $7/mo | curated city library, audio-guided prompts, monthly themed walks, full history, share card with custom signature | core revenue |
| Wonder+ Annual | $59/yr | all of monthly + printable monthly recap PDF · saves $25 | retention |
| Year of Awe | $249 one-time | 12 monthly themed walks, printed journal mailed quarterly, editor Zoom walks (4×/yr), founding member badge | gift / power user |
After 7 days the wonder map shows only your top category; sub-bars grey out unless you upgrade. No nag screen, no countdown. The greying itself is the prompt.
After every walk-log, generate a screenshotable card:
> 3 things, May 7
> the 1923 firehouse cornerstone
> the way fog moves up Divisadero
> a redwood older than the Civil War
> — Harnoor · wonder.silentinfinity.com
Camera-roll-native. iMessage-friendly aspect ratio (1080×1350). The URL is the only ask.
Wonder+ users invite one friend; both get the same prompt for 7 days, both logs show side-by-side. Free users invited via pair walks get 7 days of Wonder+ free. K-factor target: 0.4.
Every prompt is written by a real human (a local writer, a poet, a docent). Their name + IG appears under their prompt. Free attribution → local writers post screenshots → their followers discover wonder.
Most prompts ask the user to find specific physical things ("three things older than 100 years"). When a user logs a thing, they can optionally pin it on the city map — growing a crowd-sourced register of, e.g., every pre-1924 cornerstone in San Francisco. Over months this becomes a useful artifact independent of the app.
May: fog. June: bridges. July: foghorns. Each themed month produces a public-facing essay on the silentinfinity blog, pitched as the kind of piece The Atlantic or Nautilus would publish. Goal: one quote-worthy monthly essay → press → app installs.
The landing page leads with citations, not vibes. Every science line links to a Keltner/Sturm/Bai paper. The hostile journalist reading our page should leave thinking "this is real." That's our distinguishing position vs the spiritual app market.